SXSW week brought us more news from Twitter and Facebook, as well as new Hitwise traffic figures that might surprise you and a statement from Google on the future of display. Revisit all of the excitement from Austin by checking out our behind the scenes interviews, which were made possible by the sheer tenacity of David Berkowitz and some cool technology from Kyte.
Twitter Unveils @Anywhere at SXSW

The publishers above have already signed up for @anywhere.
Twitter announced a new platform at SXSW this week, which will allow publishers to integrate the service deeper into their site and create “open interactions” with readers directly from third-party sites (instead of Twitter.com). Early publishers to get on board include Amazon, Yahoo, Bing, Digg and the New York Times. For publishers, this means better interactions on their site and opportunities to accrue more followers.
In a Digital Connections post this week, David Berkowitz posed two questions that marketers should ask when considering how @anywhere will pan out in the future.
1. How important is Twitter for helping me achieve my marketing objectives?
2. How important do I want Twitter to be?
If Twitter’s an important communications channel, traffic driver, or a sales channel, then you need to follow @anywhere (literally, by following the account, and figuratively, by following related updates) and consider integrating it when it’s live.
If Twitter isn’t as essential yet, but you’re investing more resources into using it effectively and you see its influence rising (such as the share of traffic it sends to your site), then you can probably afford to be a fast follower – or a not so fast follower, where you can learn from how other sites use it before deciding how deep you want to dive in, if at all.

Google dominated industry chatter this week with its announcement of Buzz and swirling rumors of its plans to acquire social search service Aardvark. Foursquare also made headlines for its new partnerships with Zagat and the New York Times. We’ve summarized these items and more in the recap below.
Last week 360i attended a Dynamic Logic and 4A’s webinar during which they presented best practices for display banners based on analysis of best- and worst-performing campaigns (you can access the press release about the study on Dynamic Logic’s Web site).
One key insight, which we have espoused for years, is that taking the time to develop strong online creative is critical. So much so that poor-performing banners don’t merely perform worse than better creative, they actually can negatively impact brand metrics such as awareness, favorability and intent.
Here are some key design and messaging recommendations from Dynamic Logic’s analysis and some of 360i’s thoughts based on our display creative experience:
1. Brand impact is only as strong as brand presence.
Specifically keep your logo on every frame. Intrigue rarely drives awareness and response. The longer the logo appears, the higher the lift in aided awareness. And consumers most likely will not see the logo if it only appears on the product and not prominently within the ad. For example, here is one of the ads we developed for a recent Panasonic campaign. Note that the logo is persistent throughout the interactive animations.

So what’s one of the world’s most respected venture capitalists talking about at Ad Age Digital? Earned media.
He noted paid media’s about media and creative. Earned media’s about conversations, and also analysis. (He blogged about earned media recently if you want more on this).
He actually proposed a future scenario, soon available (along with the rest of his presentation), on his A VC blog, where overall marketing spending rises thanks to increases in spending on technology and creative, but a decrease in spending on media. He’s not even labeling this a prediction, but more of a possibility.
By Bryan Wiener, CEO of 360i
Display advertising: Can it be both a branding and a performance marketing tool? I’d argue yes, but not at the same time. And that’s where some of the recent debates over the art-and-science approach to display have gotten it wrong.
You see, we need to rethink the way we buy and sell display advertising in a way that clearly distinguishes between various marketers’ objectives — whether that is direct response (e.g., e-commerce sales or generating web leads) or enhancing the brand (influencing purchase intent, favorability ratings, etc). We’ll be best served by treating it not as a hybrid but as two different tactics.

Will all that twitters soon be gold? Last night, social media hotshot Twitter began rolling out house ads to its homepages. The text ads, written in the form of pithy (no surprise there) dictionary entries, currently promote the Twitter Widget and Twitter Search features – though industry insiders speculate the ads are likely being used to “test” the slots for future third party advertisements.
TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington says “it isn’t much of a stretch” to make this assumption. After all, Twitter Japan has hosted display ads since its inception last April. With an estimated 10 million users – a number that surged 33 percent in February alone – few would be surprised by Twitter CEO Evan Williams and company seeking to capitalize on this popularity and monetize the site. The question now is, how? Read the full article

Big news today – Google is getting into Behavioral Advertising. Surprising, considering the search leviathan has never been keen on Behavioral. Not surprising, considering Google Display was being left behind by competitors in the space, including Yahoo!, when it came to user-level targeting. Read the full article