<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple’s Exclusive Ad Unit Signals Potential for Agency-Publisher Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.360i.com/web-design/apply-nytimes-display-advertising-collaboration/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.360i.com/web-design/apply-nytimes-display-advertising-collaboration</link>
	<description>Digital Marketing &#38; Social Media Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:38:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robb Lewis</title>
		<link>http://blog.360i.com/web-design/apply-nytimes-display-advertising-collaboration/comment-page-1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.360i.com/?p=1208#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Creative ideas need to factor in the audience of the property as well. Unfortunately the economy has forced many pubs to allow advertisers to dominate their user experience (aptly called roadblock ads). While Apple + NYT may be able to get away with this, a majority of properties and brands will not. Just ask yourself if the NYT did this type of Ad with Microsoft would everyone be all excited, calling this the start of a new agency publisher collaboration? Not a chance! If the Apple ad played on an IT dominated site to tech folks, say slashdot, would they all be talking about how great the ads were? no way! 

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I think this is indeed a creative approach and if you have the right audience and the right advertiser it can do well. I happen to be a Mac user and liked the ads personally. But it&#039;s just not something that will work across all properties with all ads so in the end it&#039;s another custom ad unit. Pubs will need to balance if such an ad that dominates their user experience will be accepted by their audience or cause them to leave. @robblewis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creative ideas need to factor in the audience of the property as well. Unfortunately the economy has forced many pubs to allow advertisers to dominate their user experience (aptly called roadblock ads). While Apple + NYT may be able to get away with this, a majority of properties and brands will not. Just ask yourself if the NYT did this type of Ad with Microsoft would everyone be all excited, calling this the start of a new agency publisher collaboration? Not a chance! If the Apple ad played on an IT dominated site to tech folks, say slashdot, would they all be talking about how great the ads were? no way! </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think this is indeed a creative approach and if you have the right audience and the right advertiser it can do well. I happen to be a Mac user and liked the ads personally. But it&#8217;s just not something that will work across all properties with all ads so in the end it&#8217;s another custom ad unit. Pubs will need to balance if such an ad that dominates their user experience will be accepted by their audience or cause them to leave. @robblewis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny Malone</title>
		<link>http://blog.360i.com/web-design/apply-nytimes-display-advertising-collaboration/comment-page-1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.360i.com/?p=1208#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
